Comments on: Destroyed From Lack of Knowledge http://riseofthehome.com/2008/08/23/destroyed-from-lack-of-knowledge/ God saved our fallen home from the sin of adultery and showed us how to love again. Through his mercy and grace, we’re helping others to overcome and build their marriages through the perfection of Jesus’ love. Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:25:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Mr. Incredible http://riseofthehome.com/2008/08/23/destroyed-from-lack-of-knowledge/#comment-282 Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:41:26 +0000 http://riseofthehome.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-282 We know tht this is just sticking in your craw.

]]> By: Mr. Incredible http://riseofthehome.com/2008/08/23/destroyed-from-lack-of-knowledge/#comment-281 Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:40:57 +0000 http://riseofthehome.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-281 How about two sisters?

]]> By: Mr. Incredible http://riseofthehome.com/2008/08/23/destroyed-from-lack-of-knowledge/#comment-280 Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:40:19 +0000 http://riseofthehome.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-280 ==I am altering “two” to be “as many as possible.”==

So, when you said “two,” you were lying?

]]> By: manupmen http://riseofthehome.com/2008/08/23/destroyed-from-lack-of-knowledge/#comment-279 Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:38:43 +0000 http://riseofthehome.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-279 Mr. Incredible, I am altering “two” to be “as many as possible.”

]]> By: Mr. Incredible http://riseofthehome.com/2008/08/23/destroyed-from-lack-of-knowledge/#comment-278 Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:38:31 +0000 http://riseofthehome.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-278 ==Mr. Incredible, I had two sisters once, it was great.==

So, you have no problem with two sisters marrying. We see.

]]> By: Mr. Incredible http://riseofthehome.com/2008/08/23/destroyed-from-lack-of-knowledge/#comment-277 Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:37:50 +0000 http://riseofthehome.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-277 This is you:
==…the purpose of marriage is for two people to pledge themselves to each other.==

Then:

==…I am definitely in favor of three or more.==

Then:

==I am in favor of as many sexual partners as possible.==

You keep on changing your argument.

]]> By: manupmen http://riseofthehome.com/2008/08/23/destroyed-from-lack-of-knowledge/#comment-276 Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:36:30 +0000 http://riseofthehome.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-276 Mr. Incredible, I had two sisters once, it was great.

]]> By: Mr. Incredible http://riseofthehome.com/2008/08/23/destroyed-from-lack-of-knowledge/#comment-275 Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:36:09 +0000 http://riseofthehome.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-275 So, why did you say “two”? Dishonesty?

]]> By: Mr. Incredible http://riseofthehome.com/2008/08/23/destroyed-from-lack-of-knowledge/#comment-274 Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:35:27 +0000 http://riseofthehome.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-274 ==Mr. Incredible, I am in favor of as many sexual partners as possible.==

So, you were wrong when you defined “marriage” as being between two, is that it?

]]> By: Mr. Incredible http://riseofthehome.com/2008/08/23/destroyed-from-lack-of-knowledge/#comment-273 Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:34:44 +0000 http://riseofthehome.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-273 ==…the purpose of marriage is for two people to pledge themselves to each other.==

Then, you got no problem with two sisters.

How ’bout a father and his son? A mother and her daughter? A father and his daughter? A mother and her son?

How about — going along with your change of the definition of “marriage” — the mother, father and the son and the daughter? Can we get the dog in there someplace?

]]>